ArticleBMC oral health2026
CBCT assessment of maxillary molar distalization and root length changes during clear aligner therapy.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis prospective CBCT case series evaluated the pattern of maxillary molar movement during sequential distalization with clear aligners and vertical attachments, without adjunctive Class II elastics or skeletal anchorage, and assessed associated orthodontically induced inflammatory root resorption. METHODOLOGY: Ten maxillary quadrants from seven adult patients with Class II molar relationships were included. All patients were treated using a standardized sequential molar distalization protocol with clear aligners. CBCT scans were obtained at baseline (T0) and immediately after completion of molar distalization (T1). Linear crown and root positional changes, as well as molar root length changes, were assessed using three-dimensional CBCT superimposition. Descriptive statistics and paired t-tests were used, with significance set at P < 0.05.
resultsThe maxillary first and second molars demonstrated significant distal displacement at the mesiobuccal cusp tips: 1.24 ± 0.64 mm and 1.02 ± 0.82 mm, respectively. Root apex displacement was limited, suggesting crown-dominant distal movement rather than true bodily distalization. The maxillary central incisors showed significant labial incisal-edge displacement of 1.93 ± 1.27 mm, while root apex position remained stable, indicating partial anterior anchorage loss under the tested protocol. Small but statistically significant reductions in molar root length were detected, ranging from 0.19 ± 0.21 mm to 0.47 ± 0.68 mm.
conclusionsWithin the limitations of this exploratory prospective case series, sequential maxillary molar distalization with clear aligners and vertical attachments produced modest crown-dominant distal molar movement. Mild anterior anchorage loss was observed under a protocol without adjunctive elastics or skeletal anchorage. Molar root length reductions were small and remained below 1 mm. Larger controlled studies incorporating planned vs. achieved movement analysis are required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.