ArticleBMC oral health2026
Barriers to orthodontic treatment among rural children in Guangxi, China: a mixed-methods study.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMalocclusion represents a major global oral health burden, impairing function, aesthetics, and psychosocial well-being. The rates of treatment of rural children are significantly lower than for urban children. The objective of this study is to find core barriers to orthodontic treatment for these children and analyze how these factors vary by malocclusion severity.
methodsIn this mixed-methods study, we recruited 42 pairs of 11-12-year-old children with malocclusion and their parents by purposive sampling in 10 rural primary schools in Guangxi, China. Data came from semi-structured interviews; after coding, network analysis was used to find the key barriers to orthodontic treatment and to assess if these barriers varied by malocclusion severity.
resultsFinancial pressure and low orthodontic health literacy were primary barriers to orthodontic treatment. Financial pressure was consistent across all malocclusion groups, but other factors differed. For the definite group, primary barriers were the difficulty of regular follow-up, limited individual awareness of adverse effects, and personal concerns about daily impacts. For the severe group, primary factors were the parental lack of orthodontic knowledge, poor treatment timing awareness, and doubts about efficacy and safety. For the handicapping group, primary barriers were the poor awareness of the treatment time, parental concerns about children's daily life, and doubts about efficacy and safety. With the malocclusion severity increasing, primary factors shifted from child-centered concerns to parent-centered knowledge and trust issues, as individual-level barriers became less and the family-concerned environment factors became more.
conclusionsFinancial pressure and low orthodontic health literacy were the primary barriers to orthodontic treatment among rural children, with differences across malocclusion severity subgroups. From a public health view, future efforts should be focused on improving orthodontic health literacy with targeted education and awareness campaigns, especially tackling subgroup-specific barriers. Furthermore, training primary care dentists in orthodontics can help spread the related knowledge and handle simpler cases locally. Also, cost-effective treatment strategies should be explored and advanced. These could improve the treatment uptake among the rural children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.