SynthesisBMC complementary medicine and therapies2026
Traditional medicinal knowledge and diversity of medicinal plants in Benin: a systematic review (2014-2023).
Synthesis in BMC complementary medicine and therapies, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe richness of flora and traditional medical knowledge in the West African country Benin translate into the integral role of medicinal plants in local healthcare. This study explored the current status of traditional medicine research in Benin by evaluating data from ethnopharmacological and ethnobotanical surveys carried out between 2014 and 2023 and identifying knowledge gaps within the sustainable use of plant-based remedies.
methodsThe Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol was used to guide the execution of the review. A total of 129 studies identified in scientific databases were analysed. The top 20 cited plant species were subjected to a comprehensive literature review to evaluate the experimental evidence to support the reported traditional uses.
resultsA total of 765 plant species belonging to 141 botanical families were cited in the included studies to treat various animal and human diseases, including infectious diseases, digestive disorders and metabolic diseases. Severe gaps in the documentation of plant collection practices, preparation stability, and preservation techniques were observed. Khaya senegalensis A.Juss. (41 citing studies), Parkia biglobosa (Jacq.) R.Br. ex G. Don (37 citing studies) and Ocimum gratissimum L. (33 citing studies) were the most frequently cited plants. Comparison of the scientific literature on the 20 most cited plant species revealed a lack of experimental evidence, even for the most frequent traditional uses.
conclusionThis study illustrated the wide spectrum of plant species applied in Beninese traditional medicine and the critical lack of experimental evidence for their traditional applications and the conservation of medicinal preparations. These findings underscore the need for sustainable harvesting practices, community-based conservation measures, and evidence-based use of plant resources to preserve biodiversity and support long-term availability. This calls for a national database, quality standards, and better integration of traditional medicine into modern healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.