SynthesisBMC public health2026
Application of health belief model (HBM) in health sciences and medical researches: systematic review on African and Asian countries.
Synthesis in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Health Belief Model (HBM) is a widely used psychological framework for explaining and predicting individual's health related attitudes, belief, and behaviors. Although the model has been applied across various fields of health and medical sciences, the extent of its global use, particularly across African and Asian countries has not been well documented.
objectiveThis systematic review aimed to assess the application of HBM in health sciences and medical research conducted between 2010 and 2025 in Africa and Asian countries.
methodsThe review followed the updated Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Searches were conducted using keywords "Health Belief Model" combined with Boolean operators (AND, OR) across major databases, including PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library and PsycINFO. Eligible studies included peer-reviewed research articles applying the HBM within African and Asian contexts.
resultFrom a total of 1,421 identified records, 77 studies met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 61% (n = 47) were conducted in Africa countries and 39% (n = 30) in Asian countries. Most studies (64.94%) employed cross-sectional quantitative design, while 12% used mixed-methods approaches. Random controlled trial account for 9.11% of studies, quasi-experimental design for 7%, and qualitative approaches (including focus groups and in-depth interviews) for 6%. Overall, 85.71% of the studies applied all core components of HBM. Fifteen studies examined COVID-19 vaccine acceptance, nine focused on HIV/AIDS testing, counseling and prevention, and eleven studies explored non-communicable diseases prevention. Additionally, six studies assessed women's adherence to breast cancer screening, and four studies examined cervical cancer screening behaviours using HBM.
conclusionA current systematic review demonstrates that the HBM remain a valuable framework for understanding and influencing health behaviors across diverse settings. Its application in Africa and Asian research highlights its usefulness in guiding targeted interventions that address perceived susceptibility, severity, benefits, barriers, and cues to action, ultimately contributing to improved health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.