ArticleBMC public health2026
Fragile cooperation in high-casualty traffic incidents: a grounded theory study of inter-organizational emergency response in Iran.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRoad traffic injuries remain one of Iran's top four causes of death, posing a continuing public health and governance concern. Inter-organizational cooperation is frequently fragmented, particularly in mass-casualty traffic incidents, despite the existence of numerous emergency response organisations. In addition to developing a grounded conceptual framework that explains patterns of coordination failure, this study aims to theorise and model inter-organizational cooperation in such occurrences in Iran.
methodsFrom 2020 to 2024, this qualitative grounded theory study was carried out. Through semi-structured interviews and expert panel discussions, twenty-seven managers, experts, and emergency response professionals from EMS, police, fire departments, the Iranian Red Crescent Society, and academic institutions took part. The Corbin and Strauss constant comparative approach, which uses open, axial, and selective coding, was used to analyse the data.
results"Fragile Cooperation" emerged as the main category from the investigation. Adaptive and maladaptive tendencies alternated in interorganisational collaboration. Paternalistic leadership in chaotic conditions, advocacy and volunteer participation, personalised crisis encounters, increased interaction after significant incidents, and selfless risk-taking were examples of adaptive tactics. Vague responsibility boundaries, cooperation-averse communication structures, interorganisational bias and competitiveness, conflicts of interest, and disorganised event scene management were examples of maladaptive tactics. The main tactic for enhancing collaboration, according to participants, is the creation of a unified emergency response system with a single national emergency number and integrated dispatch structure.
conclusionsThe interorganisational collaboration of Iranian emergency response systems is highly dependent on relational and contextual factors and is structurally fragile. Sustainable improvement requires institutional reforms, unified emergency dispatch procedures, integrated operating protocols, and interoperable communication technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.