Observational studyBMC public health2026
The association between living environmental factors and hearing loss in Chinese middle-aged and older adults: Results from a cross-sectional and longitudinal study.
Observational study in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHearing loss (HL) substantially impairs quality of life and functional independence among middle-aged and older adults. Although individual environmental exposures have been associated with hearing health, the relationship between overall living environment quality and HL remains insufficiently understood. This study aimed to examine the association between a composite living environment score and HL in a nationally representative sample of Chinese adults.
methodsData were obtained from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS). Cross-sectional analyses included 4,404 adults aged ≥ 45 years, and longitudinal analyses followed 3,603 participants without HL at baseline for up to 7 years. A composite living environment score (range: 0-6) was constructed based on ambient PM₂.₅ exposure, household fuel type, drinking water source, building type, and indoor temperature. Cross-sectional associations were assessed using logistic regression models, while longitudinal associations were assessed using Cox proportional hazards models.
resultsIn cross-sectional analyses, higher living environment scores were inversely associated with prevalent HL (all P < 0.05). During longitudinal follow-up, 645 incident HL cases were identified. Each one-point increase in the living environment score was associated with a 5.7% lower risk of incident HL (fully adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 0.943, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.889-0.999). Compared with participants in high-risk environments, those in low-risk environments showed a lower risk of HL (HR = 0.801, 95% CI: 0.638-1.005), with evidence of a dose-response relationship (P for trend = 0.038). Restricted cubic spline analyses indicated a linear association (P for nonlinearity > 0.05).
conclusionBetter overall living environment quality was associated with a lower risk of hearing loss among middle-aged and older adults, suggesting that improvements in living conditions may contribute to healthier auditory aging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.