ArticleBMC cancer2026
Attitudes and dilemmas facing fertility preservation decision-making by oncology patients from the perspective of healthcare professionals: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFertility protection aims to prevent irreversible damage to fertility. The current study explored attitudes and dilemmas facing healthcare professionals treating oncology patients with the aim of producing empirical evidence to aid decision-making on fertility preservation.
methodsFifteen healthcare workers in oncology-related departments of three tertiary general hospitals in Hunan Province were enrolled by purposive sampling and semi-structured interviews conducted. Themes were extracted, analyzed and summarized using NVivo 12.0 software.
resultsThree themes were identified: (1) decision-making perceptions and attitudes of healthcare professionals; (2) decision-making dilemmas of patients due to psychosocial pressure, information transmission barriers, time pressures and economic burden; (3) dilemmas affecting the implementation of decisions due to the necessity to balance oncology treatment and fertility preservation and lack of decision-support resources. Seven sub-themes were also identified.
conclusionsThe current study found a need among healthcare professional participants to improve their understanding of fertility preservation, indicating significant gaps in their knowledge base. Oncology patients suffer many pressures and difficult choices which the healthcare system fails to support and a supply-side imbalance exists. The quality of fertility care in oncology requires improvement by better informing healthcare professionals, creating decision-making aids and constructing a localized decision support system. CLINICAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.