Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42351009›Full record

ArticleBMC neurology2026

Effectiveness of prophylactic administration of new-generation antiepileptic drugs for prevention of seizures following surgical clipping in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Tomomichi Kayahara, Kokyo Sakurada, Yoshiki Mochizuki, Takuma Maeda, Yushiro Take, Akio Teranishi, Hiroki Kurita

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tomomichi KayaharaDepartment of Cerebrovascular Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, 1397-1 Yamane, Hidaka, Saitama, 350-1298, Japan. t_kayahara@saitama-med.ac.jp.
Kokyo SakuradaDepartment of Cerebrovascular Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, 1397-1 Yamane, Hidaka, Saitama, 350-1298, Japan.
Yoshiki MochizukiDepartment of Cerebrovascular Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, 1397-1 Yamane, Hidaka, Saitama, 350-1298, Japan.
Takuma MaedaDepartment of Cerebrovascular Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, 1397-1 Yamane, Hidaka, Saitama, 350-1298, Japan.
Yushiro TakeDepartment of Cerebrovascular Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, 1397-1 Yamane, Hidaka, Saitama, 350-1298, Japan.
Akio TeranishiDepartment of Cerebrovascular Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, 1397-1 Yamane, Hidaka, Saitama, 350-1298, Japan.
Hiroki KuritaDepartment of Cerebrovascular Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, 1397-1 Yamane, Hidaka, Saitama, 350-1298, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe efficacy of prophylactic administration of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) for patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) remains controversial, and further research is required to ascertain the efficacy of new-generation AEDs in preventing the seizures that may occur after aneurysmal SAH. This study aimed to clarify the efficacy of prophylactic administration of new-generation AEDs in preventing the development of seizures following surgical clipping for aneurysmal SAH.

methodsA retrospective study was conducted on 89 patients diagnosed with SAH between 2021 and 2024 who underwent surgical clipping for ruptured intracranial aneurysms. In the present study, seizures were not defined based on findings of electroencephalogram, but defined as apparent convulsion. The administration of AEDs was started immediately after the surgery, and how to use the AEDs was determined by each physician, including the selection of the type of AEDs, dose escalation, and treatment duration. We investigated patient characteristics, including the development of seizures, prophylactic administration of AEDs, and clinical outcomes.

resultsOf the 89 patients, seizures were observed in 8 (9.0%) patients. Patients diagnosed with seizures were significantly older and had worse prognoses. Perampanel was administered prophylactically to a significantly larger number of patients without seizures. However, there were no significant differences in the administration of lacosamide or levetiracetam between patients with and without seizures, respectively. In contrast, no substantial differences were observed in patient characteristics, except for seizure occurrence and lacosamide utilization between those who were and were not administered perampanel.

conclusionsProphylactic administration of perampanel or adequate escalation of the dose could contribute to a decrease in the incidence of seizures developing after surgical clipping for aneurysmal SAH.

Indexed as

AnticonvulsantsPostoperative ComplicationsSeizuresSubarachnoid HemorrhageAdultAgedAneurysm, RupturedFemaleHumansIntracranial AneurysmMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSurgical InstrumentsTreatment OutcomeAnticonvulsantsAntiepileptic drugsSeizuresSubarachnoid hemorrhageSurgical clipping

Identifiers

PMID42351009
PMCPMC13573373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.