ArticleBMC pediatrics2026
The hidden bias of missing data: multiple imputation reveals geographic disparities and nutrition-WASH synergy as drivers of childhood diarrhea in Nigeria- a cross-sectional analysis of 33,924 children.
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the determinants of childhood diarrhea in Nigeria, examining socio-economic, geographic, nutritional, and WASH factors, while systematically comparing Multiple Imputation by Chained Equations (MICE) versus Complete Case Analysis (CCA) to demonstrate how missing data methods bias conclusions.
methodsA secondary cross-sectional analysis was conducted using the latest Nigerian Demographic and Health Survey (2018 NDHS) data on 33,924 under-5 children. The primary outcome was a caregiver-reported diarrhea incidence. Independent predictors were identified using multivariable logistic regression. Robustness was tested by sensitivity analyses through comparison between MICE, CCA and testing principal results under Missing Not at Random (MNAR) assumptions. Multi-dimensional risk heatmaps and correlation networks illustrated interactive risks.
resultsDiarrhea prevalence was 12.0%. Profound geo-economic and geographical disparities were uncovered; residing in the North-East was the strongest risk factor (aOR = 2.61), while wealth and maternal education demonstrated protective associations. There was a very high synergistic interaction between poor nutrition and WASH, with combined high-risk categories having the greatest prevalence of diarrhea (15.4%). Intake of eggs had a strong protective association (aOR = 0.87) that persisted under MNAR models. Sensitivity analyses revealed CCA-generated biased estimates, masking protective effects of education and inducing spurious risks for vitamin A and fruit consumption.
conclusionChildhood diarrhea in Nigeria is driven by a complex interplay of interacting factors. Effective control requires a mix of integrated, multi-sectoral interventions involving WASH, nutrition, and poverty concurrently, focusing on high-burden zones. Methodologically, advanced management of missing data is critical to produce valid evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.