Observational studyBMC cardiovascular disorders2026
Recruitment capacity and operational barriers to prehospital cardiac electrical biomarker acquisition: an ambulance-based pilot study.
Observational study in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn prehospital settings, myocardial infarction (MI) diagnosis relies on symptoms and electrocardiogram (ECG) analysis. The cardiac electrical biomarker (CEB) has been developed to quantify abnormal multipolar electrical activity through a 12-lead ECG, reflecting ischemia-related cellular disruption. This study primarily aimed to assess recruitment capacity and operational feasibility for a future large-scale prospective prehospital study involving CEB measurements. Secondary objectives were to describe successful CEB acquisition and to identify practical barriers to data collection in the prehospital environment.
methodsThis pilot study was a secondary analysis of prospectively collected observational data from the "Ambulance Région de Bienne" service (covering 120,000 inhabitants) between March and September 2023. Adult patients managed for suspected acute coronary syndrome who underwent a prehospital 12-lead ECG with attempted CEB acquisition and were subsequently admitted to the Biel Hospital Centre were eligible. Analyses were descriptive and focused on feasibility-related endpoints.
resultsA total of 70 patients were identified, of whom 60 met eligibility criteria. Regarding recruitment feasibility, a mean enrolment rate of 7.7 patients per month was observed, corresponding to roughly one patient per 70 prehospital missions. Regarding operational experience with CEB acquisition, technical and practical barriers were identified, including telemetry connectivity issues, workflow constraints, and documentation limitations. Successful CEB acquisition was variable; however, the true failure rate could not be reliably determined due to incomplete systematic documentation of all attempted acquisitions.
conclusionsRecruitment of eligible patients for a future large-scale study appears potentially feasible, with an observed rate of 7.7 patients per month within this single EMS. However, while operational barriers were identified, reliable CEB acquisition could not be assessed due to incomplete capture of failed acquisition attempts. These findings primarily inform study design and implementation strategy for future investigations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.