Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42350931›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2026

The Human Visual Claustrum Responses to Physical Stimulus Properties and Subjective Content During Movie Viewing.

Adam Coates, Paul Sedlmayr, Anna Wastian, Hannes Mayrhofer, David Linhardt, Christian Windischberger, Andreas Bartels, Anja Ischebeck, Natalia Zaretskaya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Adam CoatesDepartment of Psychology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4004-1603
Paul SedlmayrDepartment of Psychology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4363-0590
Anna WastianDepartment of Psychology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Hannes MayrhoferDepartment of Psychology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
David LinhardtHigh Field MR Center, Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8730-9793
Christian WindischbergerHigh Field MR Center, Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9944-0190
Andreas BartelsWerner Reichardt Centre for Integrative Neuroscience, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4939-7817
Anja IschebeckDepartment of Psychology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3493-2848
Natalia ZaretskayaDepartment of Psychology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4562-7045

Funding

Austrian Science Fund 10.55776/P35583Austrian Science Fund 10.55776/PAT8722623BioTechMed-GrazÖsterreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human claustrum is a small bilateral grey matter structure that is highly interconnected with cortical and subcortical regions. It has been implicated in different functions including sleep, multisensory integration, consciousness and attention, yet its exact function remains unclear. The primate claustrum is known to have distinct sensory regions, with the visual zone recently demonstrated in humans using high-resolution fMRI. In this study, we investigated stimulus properties that drive human visual claustrum activity. First, we tested the association of its response with various low- and mid-level physical stimulus features, including temporal and spatial contrast, color and motion. Second, we tested the association with subjective ratings of arousal, valence and interest. To compare the claustrum's responses with visual cortical regions, we performed the same analysis with the hV4 and hMT/V5+ complex. We found that the claustrum's visual response was associated with motion, as well as with arousal, interest and valence. The pattern of claustrum responses was similar to hMT/V5+. Given the well-established link between arousal and attentional allocation, as well as between saliency and motion, our results suggest that the visual claustrum may contribute to saliency detection and attention modulation during the sensory input.

Indexed as

ClaustrumMotion PicturesVisual PerceptionAdultArousalAttentionBrain MappingFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMotion PerceptionPhotic StimulationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42350931
PMCPMC13303107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.