ArticleEpidemiology and infection2026
Using forensic autopsy data to estimate the age-specific infection fatality risk of COVID-19.
Article in Epidemiology and infection, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The infection fatality risk indicates the probability of death among infected individuals. The age-dependent heterogeneity of infection fatality risk is crucial for severity assessment and prioritization of countermeasures. However, infection fatality risk estimation requires infection data from a large-scale seroepidemiological survey combined with either direct ascertainment of deaths caused by infection or excess mortality estimates. To overcome the difficulty in ascertaining death, we propose an alternative approach to estimating the age-specific infection fatality risk for SARS-CoV-2 using medicolegal death investigation data in Tokyo with systematic post-mortem polymerase chain reaction testing. We integrated (i) polymerase chain reaction positivity among all deceased individuals at the Tokyo Medical Examiner's Office, (ii) age-specific all-cause mortality risks from vital statistics, and (iii) age-stratified cumulative infection risks derived from seroepidemiological surveys. Infection fatality risk was computed using Bayes' theorem. Results showed that infection fatality risk increased steeply with age. Our estimates (0.02% for ages 0-39 years, 0.30%-0.50% for ages 40-64 years, and 3.8%-4.2% for those aged ≥65 years) were consistent with published pre-vaccination meta-analytic estimates. Systematic testing within medicolegal death investigation systems can provide rapid, age-resolved severity assessments, improving the timeliness and comparability of infection fatality risk estimation across jurisdictions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.