ArticleBulletin of mathematical biology2026
The Exact Hypergeometric Posterior Method for Accurate Inference of Population Size from Mark-Recapture Data.
Article in Bulletin of mathematical biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reliable inference of census population size (N) from mark-recapture data is essential in ecology, conservation, and epidemiology, yet standard estimators often rely on asymptotic approximations that can misrepresent uncertainty. We introduce the Exact Hypergeometric Posterior (EHP), obtained by normalizing the hypergeometric likelihood for the classic two-sample design, which yields an exact posterior probability mass function over integer N. Closed-form normalization enables rapid evaluation of posterior summaries and exact highest-posterior-density (HPD) credible intervals. In this study, we show how heavy right tails naturally arise in sparse-recapture regimes and provide a principled truncation using an upper bound K, such as a plausible carrying capacity or sampling-frame limit, to regularize inference when needed. For repeated sampling, independent events can be combined by posterior multiplication and renormalization, yielding substantial gains in precision without large-sample approximations. Additionally, we extend the likelihood to account for loss of marked individuals and differential catchability by introducing an availability (retention) term
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.