ArticleSpinal cord2026
Spinal cord shape factor as a predictor of postoperative functional outcome in thoracic ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.
Article in Spinal cord, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
STUDY
designRetrospective Cohort Study.
objectivesTo investigate the utility of the spinal cord Shape Factor (SF) as a preoperative predictor of surgical outcomes in patients with thoracic ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL).
settingTwo institutions in Japan.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 39 patients who underwent posterior decompression with fusion for thoracic OPLL. Preoperative SF was calculated from axial MRI at the most compressed level using the formula: SF = 4π × (cross-sectional area) / (perimeter)². Surgical outcome was evaluated by the recovery rate of the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) score one year postoperatively. The relationship between preoperative factors, including SF, and the recovery rate was analyzed. ROC curve analysis was used to determine the predictive value of SF.
resultsThe mean mJOA recovery rate was 48.84 ± 19.26%. SF showed a significant positive correlation with the postoperative mJOA score and the recovery rate. SF was significantly higher in the good recovery group (recovery rate ≥ 50%) compared to the poor recovery group. ROC analysis revealed SF was a significant predictor of good recovery (AUC = 0.7842), with an optimal cutoff value of 0.43.
conclusionsThe preoperative SF is an objective morphological parameter that reflects the degree of spinal cord deformation in thoracic OPLL. While the correlations were relatively weak, a lower SF, representing greater irregularity of the spinal cord, was associated with poorer functional recovery. These findings underscore the importance of spinal cord morphology, specifically its circularity, as a factor influencing postoperative outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42350818What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.