ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2026
Computed tomography as a solution to skeletal collection limitations: exploring cranial variation in the South African population.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluating classification approaches for population affinity estimation in a contemporary South African CT-derived sample: an automatic landmarking-based approach.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Skeletal collections have provided the foundation for forensic anthropology in South Africa, offering invaluable reference material for developing and testing identification methods. However, these collections remain limited in both size and representativeness. Many are historically biased, restricted by donation practices, and unable to reflect the demographic and biological diversity of the country's modern population. Indian South Africans, in particular, are notably absent due to cultural and religious beliefs that discourage body donation. This study explores the use of computed tomography (CT) as an alternative to overcome these limitations. A total of 408 high-resolution head CT scans representing Black, Coloured, Indian, and White South Africans were analysed using inter-landmark distances and geometric morphometrics. Measurement repeatability was high, with both intra- and inter-observer errors falling well within accepted forensic thresholds (< 2 mm; <3.5%). Significant population-level differences in cranial form were identified (p < 0.01). Black South Africans were consistently the most clearly differentiated group, while Coloured and Indian South Africans showed the greatest overlap, reflecting shared population affinity and historical admixture. Cross-validated classification accuracies ranged between 62% and 64%, indicating that both linear and shape-based analyses can capture relevant cranial variation. These results confirm that CT-derived data are reliable for examining cranial variation within contemporary South African samples and provide access to larger and more diverse datasets than traditional skeletal collections. This study establishes the first cranial reference data incorporating Indian South Africans and demonstrates how CT scanning can support the development of inclusive, population-specific standards for forensic anthropology in South Africa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.