Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42350810›Full record

ArticleMolecular systems biology2026

Common xenobiotics modulate gut microbial responses to low‑calorie sweeteners in vitro.

Sonja Blasche, Vinita Periwal, Nonantzin Beristain Covarrubias, Anna Lindell, Indra Roux, Stephan Kamrad, Simone Mozzachiodi, Rob Bradley, Hilal Ozgur, Bini Ramachandran and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular systems biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Sonja Blasche *Medical Research Council Toxicology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. sb2487@cam.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9422-0474
Vinita Periwal *Medical Research Council Toxicology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3583-0413
Nonantzin Beristain CovarrubiasMedical Research Council Toxicology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Anna LindellMedical Research Council Toxicology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4734-5287
Indra RouxMedical Research Council Toxicology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7107-2824
Stephan KamradMedical Research Council Toxicology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Simone MozzachiodiMedical Research Council Toxicology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0950-8674
Rob BradleyMedical Research Council Toxicology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-7781-9503
Hilal OzgurEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Heidelberg, Germany.
Bini RamachandranMedical Research Council Toxicology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Vladimir BenesEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0352-2547
Kiran Raosaheb PatilMedical Research Council Toxicology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. kp533@cam.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6166-8640

Funding

EC | European Research Council (ERC) 866028EC | HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme (Horizon Europe) 814408UKRI | Medical Research Council (MRC) MC_UU_00025/11
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gut microbiota is implicated in adverse effects associated with low-calorie sweeteners. Yet, the direct impact of sweeteners on gut bacteria remains largely uncharacterized. Here, we report interactions between 25 phylogenetically diverse gut bacterial strains and 39 commercially used sweeteners. We tested these sweeteners individually and in combination with four commonly co-consumed compounds, viz., advantame, caffeine, vanillin, and duloxetine. Three-quarters of the tested sweeteners individually impacted the growth of at least one tested bacterial strain. Further, over 100 interactions were found between sweeteners and the four co-consumed compounds. Isosteviol, a commonly used sweetener-component, and duloxetine, an antidepressant, synergistically inhibited Roseburia intestinalis, a bacterium previously linked to glucose homeostasis, and Parabacteroides merdae, a prevalent commensal linked to healthy microbiota. Proteomic, metabolomic, and genetic analyses indicate altered small molecule transport underpinning this sweetener-drug synergy. The isosteviol-duloxetine combination also modulated metabolism of a synthetic gut bacterial community, leading to increased toxicity to HeLa cells and altered secretion of inflammation-modulatory cytokines IL-6 and IL-8 by Caco-2 cells. Our data warrant further studies on interactions between low-calorie sweeteners and common xenobiotics.

Indexed as

BacteriaGastrointestinal MicrobiomeSweetening AgentsXenobioticsBenzaldehydesCaco-2 CellsCaffeineDiterpenes, KauraneHeLa CellsHumansInterleukin-6Interleukin-8ProteomicsThiophenesBenzaldehydesCaffeineDiterpenes, KauraneInterleukin-6Interleukin-8Sweetening AgentsThiophenesvanillinXenobiotics

Identifiers

PMID42350810
PMCPMC13538661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.