Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42350756›Full record

ArticleCJEM2026

Creating The Canadian Emergency Department Research Network (CEDRN): a new era for emergency medicine research.

Corinne M Hohl, Rhonda J Rosychuk, Patrick T Fok, Patrick Archambault, Ivy Cheng, Kavish Chandra, Steven C Brooks, Hana Wiemer, Kayla Furlong, Gabrielle Legault and 6 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in CJEM, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Corinne M HohlDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. corinne.hohl@ubc.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9210-7838
Rhonda J RosychukDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Patrick T FokDivision of EMS, Department of Emergency Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Patrick ArchambaultDepartment of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada.
Ivy ChengSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Kavish ChandraDivision of EMS, Department of Emergency Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Steven C BrooksDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Hana WiemerDivision of EMS, Department of Emergency Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Kayla FurlongDiscipline of Family and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St John's, NL, Canada.
Gabrielle LegaultDepartment of Community, Culture, and Global Studies, University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus, Kelowna, BC, Canada.
Chenoa Cassidy-MathewsIndigenous Health Research Unit, Vancouver Costal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Amber CraggDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Jeffrey P HauDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Laurie J MorrisonDivision of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Andrew D McRaeDepartment Departments of Emergency Medicine and Community Health Sciences, Foothills Medical Center, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
CEDRN investigators and the Network of Canadian Emergency Researchers

Funding

CIHR 541122
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEmergency physicians care for diverse patients with undifferentiated and evolving conditions and often make clinical decisions with limited scientific evidence. Administrative barriers to effective pan-Canadian data collection from Emergency Departments (EDs) limit our ability to generate evidence in a timely manner, particularly in times of crisis. Informed by our prior COVID-19 collaboration ( https://ccedrrn.ca ), we created the Canadian ED Research Network (CEDRN, https://cedrn.ca ) to address these barriers. Our objective is to describe the Canadian ED Research Network's approach to enabling pan-Canadian, harmonized clinical ED data collection using established infrastructure and processes to accelerate research, quality improvement, and surveillance. PRELIMINARY WORK: The Canadian ED Research Network has executed data sharing and membership agreements, privacy approvals, and multi-stakeholder governance that can support the timely launch of national multi-center observational data collection for patients presenting to participating EDs, including rural and remote sites. The Canadian ED Research Network's standardized privacy-approved data collection platform, data flow, and data management processes facilitate the creation of nationally harmonized datasets including data cleaning and verification, permit linkages with administrative datasets, and secure access to data for research ethics board approved analyses within Canada. Outcomes and analytic methods for studies are determined by study-specific steering committees. By allowing the use of data for quality improvement and surveillance, Canadian ED Research Network data can be transferred to provincial health improvement networks to create metrics to monitor public health threats and track implementation of evidence-based interventions. FUTURE DIRECTIONS: The Canadian ED Research Network is a pan-Canadian research network that has the potential to facilitate and accelerate emergency medicine research and improve care. Its broad geographic and clinical scope will allow Canadian ED Research Network studies to expand to any research relevant to emergency medicine and enhance Canada's health emergencies and pandemic research preparedness. Use of data for research, quality improvement, and surveillance may facilitate implementation of learning health systems at participating sites.

Indexed as

Data harmonizationEmergency medicineHealth services researchPreparednessQuality improvementResearch networksSurveillance

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.