ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2026
Spatial assessment of forest soil carbon and climate-related value inside and outside protected areas in China.
Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Protected areas are widely used as spatial instruments for climate mitigation, yet their contribution to below-ground carbon storage remains insufficiently quantified at national scales. This study assesses how forest soil organic carbon (SOC) and its climate-related value differ between protected and non-protected areas across China under historical and future climate conditions. Using field-based SOC observations and spatial machine-learning models, we estimated SOC density at two soil depths (0-20 cm and 0-100 cm) from 2000 to 2100 under multiple Shared Socioeconomic Pathway scenarios. Spatially explicit SOC projections were generated using Random Forest models driven by climatic, vegetative, soil, and topographic variables, and SOC differences associated with protected-area status were evaluated through comparative analysis of forested regions inside and outside established reserves. The results reveal strong spatial differentiation in SOC trajectories, with stability or accumulation under low-emission pathways and widespread losses under high-emission scenarios, particularly in deeper soil layers. Forests within protected areas consistently exhibit higher SOC densities than unprotected forests, with mean differences of 45.5% in topsoil and 33.4% across the full soil profile. Extrapolation to protected areas established after 2000 indicates potentially substantial additional SOC stocks, corresponding to climate-related values ranging from tens to over one hundred billion USD under alternative carbon price assumptions. Although spatially independent validation indicates reduced predictive performance at fine scales, the model robustly captures broad climatic and edaphic gradients. Overall, this study provides a spatially explicit assessment of forest SOC dynamics to support conservation planning and climate-mitigation strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.