ArticleNPJ precision oncology2026
Deep learning-driven MRI radiomics reveals biological subtypes and predicts recurrence risk in rectal cancer.
Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Traditional TNM staging inadequately captures the recurrence risk of rectal cancer (RC), limiting prognostic accuracy and personalized treatment decisions. Here, we developed an MRI-based deep learning approach to predict recurrence risk and leveraged pathology and transcriptomic analyses to characterize tumor heterogeneity and provide biological interpretation. In this multicenter study of 2060 patients without neoadjuvant therapy across four independent cohorts (training: n = 931; internal validation: n = 365; external validation: n = 492; biological: n = 272), unsupervised clustering of deep learning-extracted radiomic features identified three biologically distinct radiomics-based deep learning subtypes (RDLSs). Comprehensive molecular profiling using single-cell RNA sequencing (n = 7), bulk RNA sequencing (n = 83), and whole-slide imaging (n = 409) revealed that RDLS1 exhibited an immune-excluded phenotype with poor prognosis, RDLS2 showed enriched lymphocyte infiltration with favorable outcomes, and RDLS3 displayed intermediate prognosis with abundant stromal elements. Multivariate Cox analysis confirmed independent prognostic value across all cohorts (RDLS2 vs. RDLS1: HR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.29-0.82, p = 0.003). Leveraging high-risk RDLS1 features, we developed a recurrence risk scoring system (RRS) that effectively stratified patients across cohorts. Compared with the clinical model alone, integration of the RRS with clinical variables improved 5-year RFS prediction performance, increasing the AUC from 0.799 to 0.834 in the training cohort and from 0.780 to 0.825 in the external validation cohort. This noninvasive and biologically interpretable framework bridges imaging phenotypes to molecular characteristics, providing a potential approach for recurrence risk assessment and more individualized postoperative risk stratification in RC patients without neoadjuvant therapy.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.