ArticleScientific reports2026
Evaluation of a car-based method for detecting the invasive Lupinus polyphyllus Lindl in road infrastructure.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Growing recognition of the negative impacts of invasive alien plants on native species diversity and ecosystem function has led to greater focus on effective management strategies. Monitoring is crucial for both prevention of establishment and planning of eradication of established IAPs. However, monitoring is often constrained by resource limitations, and less time-consuming methods risk providing too low levels of detection. Lupinus polyphyllus is a highly problematic non-native plant species in Europe. We evaluated the detection performance of a car-based survey method for finding L. polyphyllus in road verges and how the physical characteristics of the stands influenced their detection from the car. At the 200 m scale, 85% of sections containing L. polyphyllus were correctly identified, while 72% of individual stands were detected. Results indicated that detection probability was influenced by stand density and position in the road verge. Dense stands had the highest detection probability, while single plants were less likely to be detected. Stands present in side and back slopes were more likely to be detected than those only in one slope, with the side slope stands having the lowest detection probability. Our study shows that the car-based survey is a reliable large-scale method for detecting L. polyphyllus and for providing a general estimate of its abundance in road verges. Such information is useful for designing management strategies to hinder seed production and dispersal of the invasive. Since the detection success of single plants was lower, more detailed surveys at local scales are recommended for early eradication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.