Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42350588›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026

Towards trustworthy AI-driven cuffless blood pressure monitoring.

Ana Cisnal, Itilekha Podder, Leoni Grossmann, Kanika Dheman, Mohamed Elgendi, Marco Valgimigli, Diego Paez-Granados

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ana Cisnal *Spinal Cord and Artificial Intelligence (SCAI) Lab, D-HEST, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Itilekha Podder *Spinal Cord and Artificial Intelligence (SCAI) Lab, D-HEST, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Leoni GrossmannSpinal Cord and Artificial Intelligence (SCAI) Lab, D-HEST, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Kanika DhemanSpinal Cord and Artificial Intelligence (SCAI) Lab, D-HEST, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Mohamed ElgendiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Biotechnology, Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Marco ValgimigliDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Italian Switzerland, Cardiocentro Ticino Institute, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Lugano, Switzerland.
Diego Paez-GranadosSpinal Cord and Artificial Intelligence (SCAI) Lab, D-HEST, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland. diego.paez@hest.ethz.ch.

Funding

Schweizer Paraplegiker Stiftung 2021-HS-348
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cuffless blood pressure monitoring is becoming increasingly feasible with the rise of wearable technologies, offering significant promise for preventive cardiovascular care. Yet diverse sensing modalities and modeling strategies have produced fragmented evidence that is difficult to compare. In this systematic review, we introduce a unified multi-axis taxonomy that relates surrogate signals, modeling paradigms, and calibration strategies, providing a coherent structure for the field. Building on this foundation, we analysed current approaches across physiological and wearable sensing and evaluated performance using best machine-learning practices. We highlight key barriers to real-world deployment-including protocol realism, calibration drift, population diversity, and fairness relevant reporting-and translated these findings into an actionable model-card-style reporting framework for cuffless BP studies. Our framework establishes the methodological basis for reliable, equitable, and clinically valid cuffless BP monitoring, a vital step towards democratizing continuous BP monitoring for widespread clinical benefit.

Identifiers

PMID42350588
PMCPMC13669345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.