ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026
Towards trustworthy AI-driven cuffless blood pressure monitoring.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cuffless blood pressure monitoring is becoming increasingly feasible with the rise of wearable technologies, offering significant promise for preventive cardiovascular care. Yet diverse sensing modalities and modeling strategies have produced fragmented evidence that is difficult to compare. In this systematic review, we introduce a unified multi-axis taxonomy that relates surrogate signals, modeling paradigms, and calibration strategies, providing a coherent structure for the field. Building on this foundation, we analysed current approaches across physiological and wearable sensing and evaluated performance using best machine-learning practices. We highlight key barriers to real-world deployment-including protocol realism, calibration drift, population diversity, and fairness relevant reporting-and translated these findings into an actionable model-card-style reporting framework for cuffless BP studies. Our framework establishes the methodological basis for reliable, equitable, and clinically valid cuffless BP monitoring, a vital step towards democratizing continuous BP monitoring for widespread clinical benefit.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.