ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026
Spatially identifying regions of tumor recurrence in patients with suspected recurrent glioma using physiologic MRI and machine learning.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite prior success in classifying recurrent glioma noninvasively with multi-parametric MRI and AI, clinical applicability has yet to be demonstrated due to a lack of robust model evaluation and spatial preservation of tumor characteristics. This study develops, robustly evaluates, and clinically validates an interpretable model for predicting recurrent tumors from spatially varying, histopathologically-confirmed tissue samples. Machine learning models were developed using 254 pre-surgical multi-parametric MRI patches surrounding coordinates of tissue samples taken during recurrent surgery. A test AUROC of 0.74 ± 0.08 for distinguishing recurrent tumors, and 0.99 ± 0.01 for normal-appearing brain, demonstrated the feasibility of spatially mapping heterogeneity. Important features were consistent with current literature, and uncertainty was correlated with model failures (p ≤ 0.05). Volumetrics derived from prediction maps of recurrent tumors generated using a separate cohort of 56 patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas were significantly associated with survival. These results demonstrate a step towards clinical applicability of spatially mapping glioma recurrence.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.