Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42350568›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Machine learning prediction of compressive strength in 3d printed fiber reinforced concrete using support vector regression and artificial neural networks with shapley additive explanations.

Mohamed Abdellatief, Ahmed M Saqr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mohamed AbdellatiefDepartment of Civil Engineering, Higher Future Institute of Engineering and Technology in Mansoura, Mansoura, Egypt.
Ahmed M SaqrIrrigation and Hydraulics Department, Faculty of Engineering, Mansoura University, Mansoura, 35516, Egypt. ahmedsaqr@mans.edu.eg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3458-1208

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The swift progression of three-dimensional (3D) concrete printing has opened the door to the creation of innovative materials, such as fiber-reinforced concrete, making it essential to develop accurate models for predicting their mechanical properties. Accurately estimating the compressive strength (CS) of such materials is required for optimizing mix designs and ensuring structural performance. In this context, the present study is the first to systematically investigate and compare three different support vector regression (SVR) kernels, namely, linear SVR (L-SVR), polynomial SVR (Poly-SVR), and radial basis function SVR (RBF-SVR), for predicting the compressive strength of normal, high, and ultra-high strength 3D-printed fiber-reinforced concrete (3DPFRC). A model was developed and validated using a dataset of 278 samples collected from the literature. In addition to SVR models, Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and Gradient Boosting Machines (GBM) were developed for benchmarking purposes. Results from statistical evaluation revealed that the ANN model achieved the highest predictive accuracy overall, outperforming the L-SVR, Poly-SVR, and GBM models. Among the SVR-based models, the RBF-SVR demonstrated superior performance, showing competitive accuracy with the ANN while outperforming both the other SVR variants (L-SVR and Poly-SVR) as well as the GBM model in terms of coefficient of determination (R²) value and error metrics. All models achieved R² scores ranging between 0.94 and 0.86 for the training datasets and 0.93 and 0.72 in the testing datasets. The RBF-SVR model, in particular, offered an excellent balance between accuracy, training speed, and reliability, making it a strong and efficient alternative to more complex models. Additionally, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis identified the water-to-cement ratio, silica fume content, and cement volume as the most influential parameters affecting compressive strength.

Indexed as

3D-printingCompressive strengthFiber-reinforced concreteMachine learningShapley additive explanationsSupport vector regression

Identifiers

PMID42350568
PMCPMC13303825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.