ArticleScientific reports2026
Performance analysis of a biomass gasification combined cycle power plant using rice husk and sugarcane bagasse with circular utilization of ash in green concrete.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biomass gasification is an emerging area for sustainable power generation, by utilizing readily available agricultural residues to address energy demand while reducing environmentally harmful waste disposal. The current study presents a theoretical design for a 1 MWe combined cycle power plant that uses rice husk and sugarcane bagasse as potential feedstocks. The study models the parameters by employing Python software, in which the gasification process is modelled using air-steam blending over a temperature range of 1273-1473 K. The produced syngas powers an integrated gas turbine-steam turbine configuration, achieving a predicted net energy efficiency of 39.15% for rice husk, 36.89% for sugarcane bagasse and power output of 1.05 MWe under optimal conditions. The gasification model produced normalized wet syngas yields of 2.57 kg syngas/kg biomass for rice husk and 2.45 kg syngas/kg biomass for sugarcane bagasse, corresponding to dry syngas yields of 1.77 and 1.61 kg/kg biomass, respectively, with equivalent dry volumetric yields of 2.10 and 1.56 Nm³/kg biomass. Additionally, generated rice husk ash (RHA) and sugarcane bagasse ash (SCBA) from the gasification process are further utilized to partially replace cement in the creation of sustainable concrete. The hybrid concrete showed favourable results, improving compressive strength by 12.6% and 8.2% for 10% RHA and SCBA cement replacement in a 28-day analysis, respectively, compared to conventional concrete. Furthermore, these results support the viability of the plant in agriculture-dependent countries such as India, with levelized cost of electricity readily available at $0.08-0.10/kWh.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.