ArticleNature communications2026
Spatially explicit temperature optima improve climate impact assessment of global crop productivity.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Climate impact assessments on crop productivity typically rely on globally constant temperature optima, overlooking physiological acclimation across spatial temperature gradients. This limits predictive accuracy under progressive climate warming. Here, we present 0.05-degree resolution global maps of temperature optima for rice (mean ± spatial Standard Deviation: 28.63 ± 2.65 °C), soybean (27.34 ± 2.34 °C), maize (26.12 ± 3.46 °C), and wheat (24.73 ± 3.41 °C), derived from satellite-based proxies of gross primary productivity and validated against eddy covariance flux observations. Our analysis reveals pervasive spatial heterogeneity in temperature optima within species, peaking in subtropical regions. This thermal acclimation is shaped by local temperature, water availability, and solar radiation, highlighting a phenotypic plasticity in crop thermal responses. As warming accelerates, growing-season days exceeding local temperature optima are increasing, contracting the thermal safe space, particularly in tropical and subtropical zones. This poses significant risks to maize and rice productivity. Integrating spatially explicit temperature optima into climate impact models improves global crop productivity projections by approximately 16 ± 2%, and by up to 22 ± 4% for temperate crops. These findings underscore the necessity of incorporating spatially explicit thermal responses into Earth system models to refine agricultural projections and inform targeted adaptation strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.