Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42350398›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Hippocampo-neocortical interaction as compressive retrieval-augmented generation.

Eleanor Spens, Neil Burgess

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Eleanor SpensNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. ellie.spens@ndcn.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9327-6342
Neil BurgessInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, UK. n.burgess@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0646-6584

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many aspects of learning, memory, and problem solving involve interplay between episodic (hippocampal) and semantic (neocortical) systems, but the neural mechanisms supporting this are unclear. We present a computational model in which sequential experiences are encoded in hippocampus in compressed form and replayed to train a neocortical generative network. This network captures the gist of specific episodes and extracts statistical patterns that generalise to new situations, enabling efficient reconstruction of the past and prediction of the future. The two systems interact during encoding, recall and problem solving, with the hippocampus retrieving relevant episodic information into working memory as a basis for generation using the 'general knowledge' of the neocortical network. We simulate this interaction as 'retrieval-augmented generation', with the addition of mechanisms to compress episodic memories into hippocampus and to consolidate them into neocortex. The model explains changes to memories over time, including schema-based distortions, and shows how episodic and semantic memory contribute to problem solving.

Indexed as

HippocampusMemory, EpisodicMental RecallNeocortexAnimalsComputer SimulationHumansMemory, Short-TermModels, NeurologicalNerve NetProblem Solving

Identifiers

PMID42350398
PMCPMC13447824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.