ArticlePain2026
No effect of rhythmic visual stimulation on experimental pain perception.
Article in Pain, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
abstractBrain oscillations, particularly in the alpha, beta, and gamma bands, have been implicated in pain perception through correlational studies. Rhythmic visual stimulation (RVS) offers a noninvasive method to experimentally manipulate these oscillations and examine their potential role in pain perception. We conducted 2 within-participant experiments to assess whether RVS is associated with changes in both acute pain perception and pain-related neural oscillations. In experiment 1, 41 participants received brief (13 seconds) RVS at alpha (10 Hz), beta (18 Hz), or gamma (42 Hz) frequencies, or an arrhythmic control stimulation, while experiencing calibrated thermal pain with concurrent electroencephalography (EEG) recordings. Despite a successful increase of neural oscillations at targeted frequencies confirmed by EEG, pain-evoked oscillatory responses remained unchanged across brief RVS conditions in alpha, beta, and gamma bands. To replicate previous findings, experiment 2 extended experiment 1 by using longer RVS durations and phasic pain stimuli. Forty-nine new participants underwent 10-minute RVS at either 10 Hz or a 1-Hz control before rating electrical or laser pain stimuli. Across the 2 experiments, using different stimulation protocols and pain modalities, we found no evidence that RVS was associated with changes in acute pain perception or pain-related neural oscillations, with Bayesian analyses providing strong evidence for the null hypothesis. These null findings contrast with some previous reports but align with emerging mixed evidence in the literature, suggesting that the effects of RVS on pain may be less robust or more context-dependent than initially proposed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.