ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2026
Human Steering Control Under Unpredictable Disturbances.
Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Human Steering Control Under Unpredictable Disturbances.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There are multiple methods for controlling dynamical systems under external disturbances, with some emphasizing robust performance and others prioritizing efficiency. Here, we characterized the control strategies of human steering behavior under unpredictable disturbances. Using a self-steerable motion platform, participants (n = 22) steered a vehicle along roads of different widths (narrow, medium, and wide) while experiencing random, time-varying physical perturbations. Steering control strategies were assessed in terms of the frequency-dependent gain and phase of compensatory steering for the different road widths. Participants' road-keeping performance depended on the road width. When transitioning from narrow to wide roads, participants carried over their existing control strategy, suggesting a control policy that prioritizes robustness. This persistence was reflected in the vehicle spending more time within the road boundaries of the wide road than on the narrow ones. When moving from wide to narrow roads, participants again largely maintained their control strategy, albeit with some modest modulation by road width. In the frequency domain, road order did not affect the gain but did modulate the phase of control, suggesting that any control policy adjustments occurred primarily in the timing between perturbation and response. Together, these findings suggest that feedback gains for steering under random perturbations reflect a neural control strategy mainly tuned for robustness, with only a modest influence of efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.