GuidelineThe European respiratory journal2026
Clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis of granulomatous-lymphocytic interstitial lung disease in patients with common variable immunodeficiency disorders: an ERS Clinical Research Collaboration.
Guideline in The European respiratory journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGranulomatous-lymphocytic interstitial lung disease (GLILD) is a lung disease first described in people affected by common variable immunodeficiency disorders (CVID). Despite growing recognition of GLILD, there is no accepted diagnostic and management guideline, and current practice varies significantly across centres and countries. This clinical practice guideline provides evidence- and consensus-based recommendations on the screening and diagnosis of GLILD in patients with CVID.
methodsA panel representing multiple interdisciplinary perspectives convened with methodologists to prioritise clinical questions, and review and assess the evidence using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Evidence-to-decision frameworks were used to decide on the direction and strength of recommendations.
resultsScreening for GLILD is recommended in all adult patients with CVID, preferably using high-resolution computed tomography. Evaluation should be performed by a multidisciplinary team. Routine lung biopsies are not mandatory but necessary for atypical presentations. As part of the diagnostic process, pulmonary infections should be excluded and lymphocytic alveolitis sought for by means of bronchoalveolar lavage. The severity of lung function impairment should be evaluated using pulmonary function tests including gas transfer assessment. Most of the recommendations are graded as conditional because of low certainty in the evidence regarding health effects.
conclusionsThis guideline allows for international homogeneity in the diagnosis of GLILD, thereby paving the way for improved comparability between centres, improving equity in healthcare for those affected by GLILD and facilitating multicentre research collaborations for future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.