ArticleClinics in shoulder and elbow2026
Inverse relationship between the critical shoulder angle and rotator cuff insertional footprints: an anatomical study.
Article in Clinics in shoulder and elbow, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDegenerative shoulder disorders impose a significant clinical and economic burden. The critical shoulder angle (CSA) has been established as a predictor of rotator cuff tears and glenohumeral osteoarthritis, but the anatomical basis underlying those relationships remains incompletely characterized. This study investigates whether the CSA correlates with the size of the rotator cuff muscle insertional footprints.
methodsAn anatomical study was performed on 28 shoulders from 14 formalin-fixed cadavers (mean age, 77.15 years; standard deviation, 9.94). Radiographs in the Grashey view were used to measure the CSA. The insertional footprints of the supraspinatus (SSP), infraspinatus (ISP), teres minor (TM), and subscapularis (SSC) were dissected and measured. A correlation analysis was conducted to assess relationships.
resultsA moderate inverse correlation was found between the CSA and the footprint size of all examined muscles: ISP (r=-0.52, P<0.01), TM (r=-0.60, P<0.001), SSP (r=-0.51, P<0.01), and SSC (r=-0.42, P<0.05). Large CSA values were associated with small insertional areas.
conclusionsThis study suggests that a large CSA is associated with significantly smaller-than-average insertional footprints. These findings provide an anatomical basis for biomechanical models that could help to refine risk assessment and preventive strategies for shoulder pathology. Level of evidence: Anatomical study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.