Observational studyBMJ open2026
Observational multicentre registry to update key interventions and new approaches with artificial intelligence for heart failure (OKINAWA-HF): a retrospective medical record-derived registry study protocol.
Observational study in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe efficacy of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for heart failure has been established in clinical trials, but trial populations differ substantially from real-world clinical practice. Consequently, the real-world status of GDMT implementation, the patient-level factors that determine whether guideline-recommended targets are achieved and the clinical circumstances that limit optimisation remain poorly characterised. We designed the Observational Multicenter Registry to Update Key Interventions and New Approaches with Artificial Intelligence for Heart Failure registry, a retrospective multicentre study based on medical records from seven teaching hospitals in Okinawa, Japan, to address a central scientific question: how GDMT is implemented at discharge in routine care for patients hospitalised with heart failure and which patient-level and treatment-limiting factors explain incomplete implementation. Analyses of postdischarge outcomes and artificial intelligence (AI)-derived imaging variables are explicitly positioned as secondary and exploratory components. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Consecutive patients hospitalised for new-onset or worsening heart failure will be enrolled. Clinical characteristics, laboratory data, medication use, chest X-ray and echocardiographic images will be collected. The primary analyses will describe patterns of GDMT implementation, target-dose achievement and documented reasons for non-implementation and examine patient-level clinical characteristics and treatment-limiting factors associated with incomplete GDMT implementation and target-dose non-achievement. As a secondary objective, associations between guideline-based GDMT optimisation and postdischarge clinical outcomes will be examined descriptively and as hypothesis-generating analyses. Exploratory analyses will evaluate AI-derived imaging variables obtained from routinely acquired chest X-ray and echocardiography as standardised imaging phenotypes and assess their potential incremental prognostic value beyond conventional clinical and imaging variables. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study is being conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical approval was obtained through a centralised ethics review system at the University of the Ryukyus Hospital Ethics Committee, which served as the central reviewing body for this multicentre study. Under this centralised review framework, all participating institutions conducted the study based on this single ethical approval. On completion of data collection and analyses, the findings of this study will be disseminated through academic and clinical conferences, reports to funding agencies and publications in peer-reviewed journals. We will also conduct dissemination events to report the study findings and support their application in regional clinical practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.