ArticleBMJ open quality2026
'The evidence is out there…': perspectives of healthcare providers on improving asthma and COPD prevention and care within a major health authority region of British Columbia, Canada.
Article in BMJ open quality, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAsthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) impose substantial morbidity and health system burden in Canada. Within Vancouver Coastal Health (VCH), a large and geographically diverse health authority in British Columbia, variation in service availability, access and care coordination creates barriers to prevention and high-quality chronic respiratory disease management. This project sought to document healthcare professionals' (HCPs') experiences and recommendations to inform a regional strategy to improve asthma and COPD care.
methodsWe conducted a qualitative quality improvement project using occupation-specific virtual focus groups (March to September 2021) with HCPs involved in asthma and COPD prevention and care across VCH. Purposive sampling targeted diversity in profession, practice setting and geography (urban, suburban, rural and remote). Results were analysed thematically in NVivo using iterative coding and team-based refinement.
results54 HCPs participated across 10 focus groups, including respiratory physicians (n=9), respiratory therapists (n=19), family physicians (n=11), nurse practitioners (n=2), nurses (n=7), pharmacists (n=6) and one registered dietitian (n=1). Themes aligned with a socio-ecological framework and spanned (1) patient-level barriers (financial insecurity, language barriers, comorbid mental health and substance use, medication beliefs and adherence, smoking and vaping), (2) health system barriers (limited access to spirometry and pulmonary rehabilitation, fragmented transitions and unlinked electronic records, workforce and resource constraints) and (3) environmental barriers (medication coverage and formulary restrictions, poor air quality as an exacerbation trigger). HCPs recommended expanding community-based services (including mobile diagnostics and rehabilitation), strengthening prevention and cessation supports, improving medication access and inhaler education, and building integrated pathways and information systems to support continuity across settings.
conclusionsFrontline HCP perspectives identify actionable, system-level opportunities to improve asthma and COPD prevention and care within a complex health authority. This work provides implementation-oriented insights to inform regional strategy and offers a replicable approach for engaging HCPs to strengthen chronic respiratory care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.