ReviewBMJ paediatrics open2026
Enhancing perinatal care in Rwanda: building quality improvement into system strengthening.
Review in BMJ paediatrics open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rwanda has achieved substantial gains in maternal, newborn and child health over the last two decades. But reduction in neonatal mortality has slowed, with most deaths now occurring in hospitals and health centres. Mortality is mainly caused by prematurity, perinatal asphyxia, infection and gaps in quality of care. From 2017 to 2023, the Rwanda Pediatric Association and the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health Global, in partnership with UNICEF, the Ministry of Health and Rwanda Biomedical Center, implemented a multiphase programme across 21 hospitals designed to enhance perinatal care, working intensively with nurses, midwives and doctors, integrating in situ clinical training and mentorship with hospital-led quality improvement (QI) processes. Using structured facility baseline assessments, programme-specific quality indicators and Health Management Information System data, we evaluated changes specifically in neonatal quality of care and mortality at 12 hospitals (selected for the original programme phase) where continuous neonatal data were available for the whole period. Substantial improvements were observed in core indicators of quality of care and mortality among newborns admitted to neonatal units decreased from 11.8% in 2017 to 6.2% in 2023 (a 47.5% reduction). QI processes also exposed systemic constraints-including workforce rotation, drug and equipment procurement variability, infrastructure limitations, deficiencies in equipment maintenance and gaps in referral coordination-that shape the feasibility and sustainability of clinical improvements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.