ArticleBMJ military health2026
Prehospital tourniquet use and associated outcomes in a low-resource conflict setting: prospective observational casualty data and tourniquet classification system from the Sahel.
Article in BMJ military health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionTourniquet (TQ) application is a key component of extremity haemorrhage control in high-resource military and civilian trauma systems. In settings with prolonged evacuation times, TQs can cause complications including limb loss, rhabdomyolysis, or death, yet limited data exist on the scope and impact of this problem.
methodsWe conducted a single-centre prospective observational analysis at the largest military hospital in Burkina Faso to describe injury epidemiology, TQ application practices and early outcomes among casualties with conflict-related injuries who underwent prehospital TQ application from January to July 2025.
results100 casualties (N) were included in the analysis. Mean prehospital time was 11.9 hours. The most common mechanism of injury was gunshot wound (64.0%, n=64) followed by explosion (36.0%, n=36). 114 TQs were placed. 5.3% (n=6) of TQs were both medically necessary and appropriately placed. Of 24 amputations, 54.2% (n=13) were performed at an anatomical level more proximal than otherwise indicated due to TQ application and 50.0% (n=12) were associated with TQs that were not medically necessary. Mortality was 5.0% (n=5), three of which were attributable to TQ-associated complications (eg, rhabdomyolysis, cardiac arrest).
conclusionsTQs can reduce preventable death from extremity haemorrhage but can also have harmful consequences in settings with prolonged evacuation times. In our sample from the Sahel, a low proportion of prehospital TQs were medically necessary and appropriately placed, with substantial TQ-associated morbidity and mortality. Context-appropriate clinical algorithms and training programmes are needed to reduce these complications while upholding the role of appropriate TQ use for haemorrhage control in conflict.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.