ArticleBMJ global health2026
Historical roots of hospital-centred operational governance in China: a path dependence analysis and its implications for global health system reform.
Article in BMJ global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHospital-centred operational governance has been a persistent feature of China's health system. While this model has supported administrative control, rapid service expansion and organisational standardisation, it has also contributed to the continued concentration of resources in hospitals, constrained local flexibility and the relative marginalisation of primary healthcare. This study examines, from the perspective of path dependence, how this governance model gradually emerged and persisted from 1835 to the present.
methodsDrawing on historical studies, policy documents, institutional historical data, official materials and comparative global health literature, the study identifies seven phases in the historical evolution of hospital-centred operational governance in China: missionary introduction and early administrative formation; early institutional formation; nationalist integration and public function expansion; wartime adaptation and emergency coordination; socialist consolidation and planned administration; market transition and managerial modernisation and optimisation, digitalisation and performance governance.
resultsAcross these stages, four self-reinforcing mechanisms collectively stabilised this pattern: institutional steering, functional expansion, managerial standardisation and market-oriented transformation. The evidence indicates that hospitals became dominant not simply because they appeared earlier but because they repeatedly accumulated administrative visibility, professional authority, technical capacity, fiscal channels and reform implementation functions.
conclusionsFor health system reform, the findings suggest that strengthening primary healthcare and improving equity require technical management reforms to proceed in parallel with changes in governance power, financing incentives, resource allocation, workforce status and data infrastructure. The global health implication is that countries pursuing universal health coverage should avoid allowing hospitals to become the default centre of finance, information, professional prestige and policy implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.