ArticleNeuron2026
A two-timepoint framework for sensitive and specific single-cell activity screening.
Article in Neuron, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Lasting aversive consequences of a single dose of 4-hydroxytamoxifen.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Methods to identify brain areas where neurons are activated in response to stimuli or states typically rely on immediate early gene (IEG) expression. However, variability in IEG expression across subjects and brain areas often requires large sample sizes. Further, IEG expression alone cannot determine whether the same or different neurons are activated in response to two distinct stimuli or states. To overcome these challenges, we developed a brain screening method-two-timepoint statistical inference with subtraction (TTP-S)-to identify brain areas on the basis of activity at two timepoints, not one. Applying this approach across 500+ brain areas increases the sensitivity and specificity of screens for engaged brain areas, thereby reducing the required sample size. Coupled with graph theoretical analyses, we use this method to analyze hunger, satiety, food cue presentation, drug treatment, and alcohol consumption, identifying known relevant brain regions and implicating new areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.