ArticleTranslational oncology2026
Establishment, biobanking, and multi-omics characterization of 41 patient-derived colorectal cancer organoids: MYC/PRC classification.
Article in Translational oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeColorectal cancer (CRC) exhibits marked genetic, transcriptomic, and phenotypic heterogeneity, limiting the robustness of existing molecular classification systems. We aimed to apply and validate an SMI-based MYC/PRC classification framework in CRC patient-derived organoids and to characterize its molecular, pharmacologic, and clinical relevance across independent cohorts.
methodsWe established 41 CRC PDOs from 28 patients and performed whole-exome sequencing, RNA sequencing, and high-throughput drug screening. SMI scores (-1 to 1) were used to classify PDOs as MYC-type (stem-like) or PRC-type (differentiated). A concordantly classified subset of 25 PDOs underwent integrative multi-omics analyses. Findings were validated in an expanded cohort of 181 CRC PDOs and in TCGA-COAD. We compared pathway activities, mutational profiles, and drug responses, and performed archetypal modeling (K = 2) to position samples along a MYC-PRC transcriptional continuum.
resultsMYC-type PDOs exhibited enrichment of cell-cycle and proliferation-related programs, whereas PRC-type PDOs showed differentiation-associated transcriptional programs, including coagulation and NF-κB signaling. Drug screening showed greater sensitivity of MYC-type PDOs to MEK/EGFR-targeted agents, whereas PRC-type PDOs displayed more heterogeneous responses. Archetypal modeling preserved the α(PRC)-α(MYC) trade-off and sample ordering across feature sets and larger cohorts. Validation in the expanded PDO dataset and TCGA-COAD reproduced subtype-specific transcriptional patterns and supported their clinical relevance.
conclusionsSMI-based MYC/PRC classification captures biologically coherent tumor states with distinct molecular features and therapeutic sensitivities. This transcriptome-based framework complements existing classification systems and may support subtype-informed therapeutic prioritization in CRC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.