ReviewTranslational oncology2026
PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors in Hodgkin lymphoma: A meta- and network meta-analysis.
Review in Translational oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHodgkin lymphoma (HL) is a relatively rare lymphoid malignancy that significantly affects the health of adolescents, young adults and the elderly. Even though conventional chemotherapy offers high cure rates, the relapsed/refractory HL remains challenging.
methodsPooled single-arm and network meta-analyses were used. Literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library and Clinical Trials, et al., from the date of establishment dates to August 31, 2025. Studies were screened based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. The primary outcome analyzed was complete response rate (CRR), partial response rate (PRR), and objective response rate (ORR).
results11 single-arm trials and five controlled trials, involving 1602 participants and seven ICI-based treatment strategies were included. The meta-analysis revealed an overall CRR of 0.35, a PRR of 0.37, and an ORR of 0.75 across all therapy methods. Of these, one ICI drug in combination with conventional therapy demonstrated the highest CRR and ORR, while camrelizumab achieved the highest PRR. The treatment strategies with the highest CRR in network meta-analysis was the combination of two ICI drugs. The strategies with the highest PRR were camrelizumab, a single ICI drug, while the strategies with the highest ORR was a single ICI drug combined with conventional therapy.
conclusionThis study suggests that camrelizumab is associated with an improved PRR for HL, whereas, combination strategy of two ICI drugs, and that one of pembrolizumab and camrelizumab combined with conventional chemoradiotherapy are more effective for elevating the CRR and ORR respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.