Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42349246›Full record

ArticleESMO open2026

Distinct molecular and clinical aggressiveness in very early-onset metastatic colorectal cancer: survival and genomic divergence between patients aged 30-39 versus 40-49 years.

A Pretta, G Rebecchi, G Maddalena, F Marmorino, P Ziranu, F Manoni, M C De Grandis, M Carullo, P A Ferrari, C Donisi and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ESMO open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

A PrettaDepartment of Medical Sciences and Public Health, Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital and University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy. Electronic address: an.pretta@gmail.com.
G RebecchiMedical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
G MaddalenaOncology Unit 1, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy.
F MarmorinoUnit of Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy; Department of Translational Research & New Technologies in Medicine & Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
P ZiranuDepartment of Medical Sciences and Public Health, Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital and University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
F ManoniMedical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
M C De GrandisOncology Unit 1, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy.
M CarulloUnit of Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy; Department of Translational Research & New Technologies in Medicine & Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
P A FerrariDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Thoracic Surgery and Interventional Bronchoscopy Unit, A.R.N.A.S. "G. Brotzu", Cagliari, Italy.
C DonisiDepartment of Medical Sciences and Public Health, Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital and University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
G RandonMedical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
E PerissinottoOncology Unit 1, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy.
A TaravellaUnit of Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy; Department of Translational Research & New Technologies in Medicine & Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
V NascaMedical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
F BugginOncology Unit 1, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy.
G PrettaScience Department, King's School Hove, Brighton and Hove, UK.
P CiracìUnit of Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy; Department of Translational Research & New Technologies in Medicine & Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
F BergamoOncology Unit 1, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy.
C CremoliniUnit of Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy; Department of Translational Research & New Technologies in Medicine & Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
S LonardiOncology Unit 1, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy.
M ScartozziDepartment of Medical Sciences and Public Health, Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital and University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
F PietrantonioMedical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) is increasing worldwide and exhibits clinical heterogeneity. Patients younger than 40 years may constitute a biologically distinct subgroup within EOCRC. We investigated whether 'very early-onset' metastatic colorectal cancer (VEOCRC, ages 30-39) exhibits specific clinical and genomic features compared with EOCRC in patients aged 40-49 and whether these differences lead to variations in survival from the time of metastatic diagnosis. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe analysed the data of metastatic EOCRC patients in a multi-institutional database, divided into two predefined age groups: 30-39 years and 40-49 years. Overall survival (OS) from metastatic diagnosis was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods, and hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated with Cox regression. Comprehensive genomic profiling was carried out using the Foundation Medicine next-generation sequencing platform (FoundationOne®). Key molecular alterations were compared using odds ratios (ORs). Baseline clinicopathologic characteristics were assessed using χ

resultsA total of 264 patients were included (aged 30-39: n = 65; aged 40-49: n = 199). Median OS was shorter in patients aged 30-39 years than in those aged 40-49 years (30.0 versus 38.0 months; log-rank P = 0.0269; HR 0.67). A distinct genomic profile appeared in patients with VEOCRC, characterised by higher KRAS mutation rates (55.4% versus 42.0%; OR 1.71; one-sided P = 0.041) and fewer APC alterations (69.2% versus 82.0%; one-sided P = 0.024). NRAS, BRAF, PTEN, and POLE alterations were directionally consistent with a more aggressive biology, although event counts were limited. Clinically, overall Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) distribution was similar (χ

conclusionsPatients aged 30-39 years constitute a biologically distinct subgroup within EOCRC, with shorter survival, KRAS mutation enrichment, fewer APC alterations, and increased peritoneal involvement. These findings support the emerging idea of an 'ultra-young', genomically driven CRC subtype, with implications for disease biology, risk assessment, and treatment development.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsAdultAge of OnsetFemaleGenomicsHumansMaleMiddle AgedMutationNeoplasm Metastasisearly-onset colorectal cancermetastatic colorectal cancermolecular profilingnext-generation sequencingprecision oncology

Identifiers

PMID42349246
PMCPMC13325296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.