Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42349020›Full record

ArticleJournal of primary care & community health

Hands-on Education to Increase Comfort and Knowledge Utilizing In-Check

Robert Strother, Nathaniel E Miller, Audrey Umbreit, Maddie Lee, Julia Smoak, Danielle Firkus, Amanda Davis

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of primary care & community health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Robert StrotherDepartment of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3217-3697
Nathaniel E MillerDepartment of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4646-1748
Audrey UmbreitDepartment of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4930-4497
Maddie LeeDepartment of Pharmacy, Drake University, Des Moines, IA, USA.
Julia SmoakDepartment of Pharmacy, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Danielle FirkusDepartment of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Amanda DavisDepartment of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

IntroductionCorrect inhaler technique is of utmost importance in the optimal delivery of therapeutics utilized for respiratory illnesses. Previous research suggests that the ability of both patients and providers to correctly use these inhalers is sub-optimal and is associated with poorer patient outcomes. Further education about inhaler types and technique as part of residency education could serve to correct these trends.MethodsFamily medicine residents were taught correct inhaler technique with an inhaler training device (In-Check

Indexed as

Family PracticeHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeInternship and ResidencyNebulizers and VaporizersClinical CompetenceHumansSurveys and Questionnaireseducationhand-on didacticsinhaler techniqueinterprofessionaltrainee

Identifiers

PMID42349020
PMCPMC13305484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.