ArticleBlood advances2026
Rapid and reproducible karyotyping with long-read sequencing in patients with AML.
Article in Blood advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractAcute myeloid leukemia (AML) is characterized by recurrent chromosomal abnormalities that form the basis of the European LeukemiaNet risk classification and serve as essential determinants of prognosis and therapeutic decision-making. Conventional metaphase karyotyping remains the diagnostic gold standard for detecting these abnormalities; however, its utility is limited by longer turnaround times, often delaying critical clinical management. Here, we present a long-read, low-coverage whole-genome sequencing (lcWGS) approach using Oxford Nanopore Technology as a rapid and scalable alternative for cytogenetic profiling. A total of 100 diagnostic AML samples were analyzed, comprising 50 retrospectively selected patients with known adverse-risk cytogenetics and 50 prospectively enrolled patients with clinically defined de novo AML. LcWGS demonstrated robust analytical performance, identifying chromosomal aberrations with 93% sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy, respectively. Complex karyotypes were reliably detected, with an area under the curve of 0.971. Reproducibility was validated through replicate sequencing at 2 independent laboratories (R = 0.99). LcWGS-derived estimates of clone size showed moderate correlation with conventional cytogenetic assessments (R = 0.54). Patients with complex karyotypes identified by lcWGS exhibited significantly shorter overall and relapse-free survival, closely mirroring outcomes defined by conventional karyotyping and underscoring the value of lcWGS for risk stratification. The median turnaround time from sample receipt to bioinformatics interpretation was ∼34 hours, enabling delivery of actionable karyotype results within 72 hours. These findings establish lcWGS as a rapid, reproducible, and accurate platform for detecting clinically relevant chromosomal abnormalities, addressing a critical need for timely risk stratification and treatment initiation in AML.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.