ArticleHealth policy and planning2026
Balancing policy ambition and systems reality in expanding access to non-communicable diseases medicines: lessons from Ghana and Georgia.
Article in Health policy and planning, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ensuring sustained access to affordable, high-quality medicines is central to achieving universal health coverage (UHC) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This is particularly true for chronic non-communicable diseases (NCDs), which require long-term, uninterrupted treatment. Although global guidance recommends expanding pharmaceutical benefits, regulating prices, promoting generics, and strengthening procurement and supply chains, many LMICs continue to face inequities in medicine availability and high out-of-pocket costs. The experiences of Ghana and Georgia, two countries that have invested heavily in UHC reforms, pharmaceutical benefits, centralized procurement, and pricing policies, illustrate gaps between policy ambitions and implementation realities in expanding access to NCD medicines. This paper examines four health-system factors influencing access to NCD medicines: system capacity, provider behaviour, digital enablers, and public trust. In both countries, centralized procurement faces forecasting inaccuracies, procurement delays, supply chain weaknesses, and distribution challenges, leading to stockouts and inconsistent availability. Provider behaviours further influenced access, with reimbursement delays, low payment rates, and administrative burdens contributing to informal fees, off-list prescribing, and suboptimal use of generics. Investments in digital systems such as logistics management information systems and electronic prescribing showed promise but were limited by uneven adoption, data quality issues, and insufficient integration into decision-making processes. Public awareness and trust emerged as critical yet neglected determinants. Limited communication and perceptions of low quality of state-purchased medicines reduced uptake of benefits in Georgia, while gaps between National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) intentions and patient experiences constrained equitable access in Ghana. Strengthening access to NCD medicines requires system-wide readiness, aligned provider-patient incentives, effective digital integration, and sustained community engagement to build trust and support uptake.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.