ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2026
Use of the Online Portal "Embryotox" in Routine Health Care: Mixed Methods Study.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Since 2008, the open-access internet portal "Embryotox" has provided evidence-based information on drug safety during pregnancy and breastfeeding. The German website, designed for health care professionals, comprises fact sheets about 400 drugs and is maintained by the Embryotox Center of Clinical Teratology and Drug Safety in Pregnancy at the Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin. In 2024, it was accessed more than 5 million times. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate who is using the website, how it is being used, and to what extent it meets users' needs. Methods: Data were collected between 2022 and 2023 through a sequential mixed methods design incorporating explanatory and exploratory elements. Online questionnaire 1 contained questions on user characteristics, clinical specifics of use, comprehensibility, and changes in risk assessment or drug therapy following fact sheet use. Qualitative data were generated through semistructured phone interviews, with interviewees sampled from the main user groups identified in questionnaire 1 (patients, physicians, pharmacists, and midwives). Kuckartz's content analysis was used to analyze data on users' trust and the functions of website use for different stakeholder groups. Online questionnaire 2 collected data from the main user groups on their decision-making based on Embryotox fact sheets. This questionnaire was developed based on the findings from semistructured interviews on the functions of website use. Answers in both questionnaires included multiple-choice options or ratings on a Likert scale from 0 (not at all) to 10 (fully); data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: Questionnaire 1 was completed by 14,562 users, including 10,860 patients, 1676 physicians, 550 pharmacists, and 364 midwives. Of the physicians, 27.2% (456/1676) were obstetricians and gynecologists, and 22.7% (381/1676) were general practitioners. For physicians, the mean of comprehensibility ratings was 9.39 (pharmacists 9.25; midwives 9.14), and for patients 8.80. Following fact sheet use, 66.6% (9694/14,562) of all users changed their risk perception, and 22.3% (2252/10,083) of users in a specific treatment setting considered changing drug treatment. Qualitative content analysis revealed that users highly trusted the information in the fact sheets for a number of reasons, including recommendations from other users, the scientific basis of the website, and the authority of the Embryotox Center as a university-based specialist department for drug safety in pregnancy and lactation. Functions of fact sheet use differed depending on the stakeholder group. A total of 793 users, mostly physicians and patients, fully completed questionnaire 2, specifying typical clinical situations and benefits of fact sheet use for shared decision-making. Benefits included facilitating the decision-making process and increasing confidence in it. Conclusions: The information provided in the Embryotox fact sheets was generally perceived as both comprehensible and trustworthy, supporting and facilitating the decision-making process. Embryotox is used successfully by health care providers and patients in routine health care settings, helping to improve drug safety for pregnant and breastfeeding women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.