ArticleJMIR perioperative medicine2026
Comparing the Quality of Patient Recovery After Open Appendectomy Under General Versus Spinal Anesthesia: Prospective Cohort Study.
Article in JMIR perioperative medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Open appendectomy is commonly performed under either general or spinal anesthesia. Postoperative quality of recovery, a multidimensional patient-centered measure of outcomes after surgery, is affected by the choice of anesthesia technique. Objective: The objective of our study was to compare the effects of general and spinal anesthesia on the immediate postoperative quality of recovery in adults undergoing open appendectomy. Methods: In this prospective cohort study, 74 patients were assigned to either the general (n=37) or the spinal anesthesia (n=37) groups. The primary outcome was the total Quality of Recovery-15 score measured 24 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain scores, analgesic consumption, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, time to first oral intake, time to first ambulation, and length of hospital stay. Intergroup comparisons were performed using the chi-square test, Fisher exact test, independent t test, or Mann-Whitney U test, as appropriate. Results: Patients in the spinal anesthesia group had significantly higher Quality of Recovery-15 scores than those in the general anesthesia group (P=.001). They also exhibited lower pain scores at 1, 2, 6, and 12 hours postoperatively (P<.001), reduced consumption of diclofenac and tramadol, and a decreased incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (P<.001). The time to first mobilization, time to first oral intake, and length of hospital stay were also significantly lower in the spinal anesthesia group (P<.001). Conclusions: Spinal anesthesia is the preferred anesthesia technique for patients undergoing open appendectomy. It may provide improved postoperative recovery, with lower pain scores and improved analgesia. It may also reduce the need for additional analgesics, decrease the incidence of nausea and vomiting, and improve intrahospital patient recovery trajectories.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.