Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42348848›Full record

Trial reportAge and ageing2026

Geriatric team support in the emergency department-a randomised trial investigating the effects on hospital admission and community care in older adults (GerED-21).

Maria L Lunardelli, Dino Gibertoni, Alessandra Colantoni, Chiara Bendini, Paola Forti, Stefania De Notariis, Fabiola Maioli, Manuela Petroni, Anna Nardelli, Maria Modugno and 1 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Age and ageing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Maria L LunardelliGeriatric Acute Care, Orthogeriatric Unit & Centre for Diagnosis of Cognitive Disorders and Dementia, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna , Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3043-1819
Dino GibertoniEpidemiology and Statistics Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1722-3724
Alessandra ColantoniInter-institutional Department of Emergency Medicine, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4662-7426
Chiara BendiniGeriatric Acute Care, Orthogeriatric Unit & Centre for Diagnosis of Cognitive Disorders and Dementia, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna , Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4711-2195
Paola FortiDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6452-8697
Stefania De NotariisInter-institutional Department of Emergency Medicine - Unit for Urgent care in older and frail adults, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Fabiola MaioliDepartment of Integration, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Manuela PetroniDepartment of Technical Health and Rehabilitation Assistance (DATeR), Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Anna NardelliGeriatric Unit, Inter-institutional Department of Continuity and Complexity, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma, Parma, Italy.
Maria ModugnoGeriatric Unit, Inter-institutional Department of Continuity and Complexity, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma, Parma, Italy.
Fulvio LauretaniClinic Geriatric Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5287-9972

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Emergency Department (ED) is a 'strategic crossroads' for geriatric care, as older adults represent nearly 50% of ED visits resulting in hospital admissions. It is therefore essential to integrate geriatric expertise within the ED to address their complex needs and improve outcomes.

aimsThis study evaluated whether implementing a Geriatric Team (GT) comprising geriatricians, nurses, social workers, tasked with conducting Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment and delivering tailored interventions in the ED, could reduce unnecessary hospital admissions and repeated ED visits compared to standard practice. MATERIALS AND

methodsA multicentre, parallel, unblinded, superiority randomised study was conducted on people aged 75 years or older who scored ≥2 on the Triage Risk Stratification Tool upon ED admission. Randomisation was computer-generated and applied to calendar weeks. The primary outcome was hospital admission at the index ED visit. The secondary outcomes were ED readmissions; hospitalisations; mortality at 7, 30 and 90 days; and functional status at 30 and 90 days.

resultsThe study included 624 participants, 314 (50.3%) in the GT group and 310 (49.7%) in the usual care group. Hospital admissions at the index ED visit were 13.7% in the GT and 56.8% in the usual care group. ED readmission and hospitalisation rates were similar across groups. All-cause 30-day mortality was similar across groups, while 90-day mortality was lower in the intervention group. Functional decline was attenuated at both 30 and 90 days in the GT group.

conclusionsBy relieving pressure on inpatient services, the GT integration into ED workflows represents a scalable strategy for health systems facing demographic shifts and rising demand for age-sensitive care.

Indexed as

Community Health ServicesEmergency Service, HospitalGeriatricsHealth Services for the AgedPatient AdmissionPatient Care TeamAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsEmergency Room VisitsFemaleFunctional StatusGeriatric AssessmentHumansMalePatient Readmissioncomprehensive geriatric assessmentemergency departmentfrailtyhospital admissionsolder adults

Identifiers

PMID42348848
PMCPMC13298639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.