Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42348840›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2026

Toward the regularization of E value from BLAST similarity search into a dissimilarity measure as distance function, and the metrication of protein sequence space.

Boryeu Mao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Boryeu MaoIndependent Researcher, Retired with no public or private institutional affiliations.ORCID 0000-0002-5347-9073

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sequence matching algorithms such as BLAST and FASTA have been widely used in searching for evolutionary origin and biological functions of newly discovered nucleic acid and protein sequences. As parts of these search tools, alignment scores and E values are useful indicators of the quality of search results (and the relevance of the matches) from querying a database of annotated sequences, whereby a high alignment score (and inversely a low E value) reflects significant similarity between the query and the subject (target) sequences. For cross-comparison of results from sufficiently different queries, however, the interpretation of alignment score as a similarity measure and E value a dissimilarity measure becomes somewhat nuanced, and prompts herein a judicious distinction of different types of similarity. Via a simulated formulation, we show that an adjustment of E value to account for self-matching of query and subject sequences corrects for certain ostensibly anomalous similarity comparisons, resulting in "regularized" dissimilarity and similarity measures that would be more appropriate for cross-comparisons, as well as database applications, such as all-on-all sequence alignment or selection of diverse subsets. In actual practice, the "regularization" of E value dissimilarity improves clustering and subset selection. While both E value and the "regularized" E value share two of the four axiomatic properties of a metric space, positivity, and symmetry, the latter E value further becomes reflexive and meets the condition of triangle inequality, the remaining two axioms, thus itself an appropriate distance function for metricating protein sequence space.

Indexed as

ProteinsSequence AlignmentSequence Analysis, ProteinAlgorithmsAmino Acid SequenceComputational BiologyDatabases, ProteinProteinsBLAST similarity searchE valueprotein sequence comparisonrelaxed triangle inequality and generalized metric spacesimilarity and dissimilarity measures for protein sequence space

Identifiers

PMID42348840
PMCPMC13395823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.