ArticleScience progress
A diagnostic model for non-invasive localization of culprit lesions in NSTE-ACS by integrating CCTA geometric and plaque parameters.
Article in Science progress. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectiveThis study aimed to identify valuable quantitative plaque parameters and adverse vascular geometric features for constructing a diagnostic model to improve culprit vessel identification in Non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS).MethodsData from 144 consecutive NSTE-ACS patients who underwent both Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) and invasive coronary angiography (ICA) were retrospectively analyzed. Coronary geometric characteristics and quantitative plaque parameters were derived from CCTA data. Patients were randomly split into training and validation sets at a 7:3 ratio. Using logistic regression and stepwise regression, three models were developed: (I) diameter stenosis + high-risk plaque (HRP); (II) Model I + quantitative plaque parameters; (III) Model II + adverse geometric characteristics (AGCs). The optimal model was selected by comparing the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC), and nomograms with calibration and decision curves were generated.ResultsThe results demonstrated that the multivariable logistic regression model integrating diameter stenosis, HRP, quantitative plaque parameters, and AGCs exhibited excellent diagnostic performance, with AUCs of 0.95 and 0.92 in the training and validation sets, respectively. Decision curve analysis confirmed the model's net benefit across threshold probabilities, demonstrating its clinical utility.ConclusionsThis CCTA-based model showed high predictive capability, further enhanced by incorporating vascular geometric features, offering a clinically valuable tool for the precise identification of culprit lesions in NSTE-ACS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.