ArticlePloS one2026
Tracking the narrative: A data-driven analysis of media coverage of Russia and Ukraine 2013-2024.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study addresses the lack of global, long-term analyses of media narratives on Russia and Ukraine by examining their evolution from 2013 to 2024. Based on 22.2 million article titles from 14,622 sources operating in 194 countries and covering up to 74 languages, this study employs a hybrid human-AI approach combining multilingual clustering, cluster linking, manual annotation, entity analysis, and analysis of the language distribution of articles by Russian sources. We show that media coverage increased sharply around key geopolitical events, including the Euromaidan protests (2013-2014), the annexation of Crimea (2014), and Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine (2022). Multilingual clustering, in combination with manual annotation, identifies recurring patterns in coverage, including geopolitical tensions between Russia and the West, energy security, and disinformation campaigns. Cluster linking reveals how these patterns evolved over time in response to major events: clusters in 2013-2014 focused on the Russia-Ukraine gas dispute, the Euromaidan protests, and Crimea, while those in 2021-2022 centred on the full-scale invasion and its global repercussions. Entity analysis shows that media attention consistently concentrated on a small set of political figures, including Vladimir Putin, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, and Donald Trump, whose prominence varied across different phases of the conflict and key political events. Analysis of Russian media further indicates sustained publication in foreign languages, with increases during key geopolitical moments and differences in how the conflict is contextualised across language groups. Despite uneven regional and linguistic coverage, this study provides a large-scale, long-term, and multilingual overview of media coverage. Future research could extend this work through cross-country comparisons, linking narrative shifts to external variables, such as public opinion data or electoral outcomes, and applying the methodology to other large-scale datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.