ArticlePloS one2026
Clinical practice teaching system for MNS cardiac rehabilitation: Delphi consensus.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChina faces a growing demand for cardiac rehabilitation professionals that outstrips available medical resources. While nursing master's candidates represent key talent reserves, current higher education lacks standardized training frameworks for cardiac rehabilitation nursing. This study developed a competency-based clinical training system through expert consensus to address this educational gap.
methodsA modified two-round Delphi process engaged 22 cardiac rehabilitation experts. Initial expert feedback informed questionnaire refinement, followed by consensus-building analysis in the second round.
resultsThe Delphi study demonstrated high engagement (100% Round 1; 96% Round 2 response rates) and acceptable expert authority (Cr = 0.83‑0.84). Kendall's W values ranged from 0.13 to 0.21 (p < 0.05), indicating moderate agreement among experts. The consensus process yielded a structured framework of 5 domains, 29 subdomains, and 85 competency indicators.
conclusionThe teaching system is scientifically valid, targeted, and practical, providing a comprehensive framework for training master's degree candidates in cardiac rehabilitation nursing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.