ArticlePloS one2026
Demonstrating conservation impacts in California Marine Protected Areas using large-scale participatory science data.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Measuring human interactions with protected areas is a key need in conservation social science, both to assess the potential for continuing negative impacts on sensitive resources and to support positive relationships with important places. Our paper investigates human activities in California Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) using an emerging approach of large-scale participatory data collection coupled with statistical analysis. Twelve organizations across the state developed, standardized, and implemented a data collection protocol for volunteers to record human activities, called "MPA Watch." From 2012-2020, approximately 1,900 surveyors conducted more than 31,700 surveys, observing more than 1.2 million activities at 104 different sites across California's coast, both inside and outside MPAs. We analyzed these data using generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) with zero inflation to account for sampling bias associated with volunteer-driven data. We included covariates regarding weather and tides; time of day, week, and year; and beach type and amenities. We found statistically significantly lower consumptive activities inside MPAs with the strictest protections as compared with non-MPAs, and no significant difference between MPAs and non-MPAs for non-consumptive recreational activities. Some consumptive activities significantly declined over time. We also detected expected use patterns (e.g., for all activity categories, weekend counts were significantly higher than weekday counts). In addition, we noted patterns of interest for future study, including much higher incidence of non-consumptive activities than consumptive activities at a statewide level; higher popularity of some activities at certain individual sites; and the beginnings of the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. Our analysis demonstrates that consumptive activities are lower inside California MPAs (indicating compliance with MPA rules), and results at particular sites can inform site-specific management strategies. Further, we show the potential of large-scale participatory science, coupled with appropriate statistical modeling, to monitor and inform conservation policy and management for protected areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.